Since the Rico charge was found not guilty, what is the likelihood that on appeal that the two charges Diddy was found guilty on be dismissed due to the fact the Government was able to introduce evidence that normally would not have been able to be presented to a jury was admitted. Of course, If those acts occurred beyond normal statute of limitations.
Well I actually wanted to know if you knew about The "Permanent Peoples' Tribunal on Gaza"? On June 19th, after the second public hearing, (first heg. in May) the judges determined that Israel and Netanyahu are committing the genocide of the Palestinian people. They also indicated that U.S. President Trump is financially and provide help Israel to commit genocide of the Palestinian people. U.S. Congress who vote and distribute financial help to Israel are also responsible for the genocide of the Palestinian people.
Trump was also declared as escalating destabilization, with Netanyahu's influence in the Middle East and the PPT want that to be stopped.
This will go the ICJ.
WHAT HAS TO HAPPEN FOR THIS GENOCIDE TO STOP?
Netanyahu is coming to White House this coming week for more $ begging. But now we know that the PPT has findings.
Prediction: Sean Diddy Combs will get bail pending sentencing and that bail will be continued pending appeal. (1) There’s a substantial question of law likely to result in reversal or a new trial, as required under 18 U.S.C. § 3143(b)(1)(B). (2) He is not a flight risk, now that the threat of a life sentence is off the table. (3) He has already served a significant amount of pretrial detention, mitigating public safety concerns and suggesting he's not a danger or a fugitive risk. (4) The case raises appealable legal errors, especially if they pertain to jury instructions, admissibility of key evidence, or denial of certain constitutional protections (e.g., confrontation clause or due process issues). (5) With “Life” off the table, continued detention could be argued as punitive rather than regulatory—which violates United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (1987). The foregoing is especially true with a clean pretrial record and no misconduct during his year-long pre-trial detention. If bail pending appeal is denied, that decision is separately appealable. If Combs does receive a term of imprisonment beyond what he has already served, it is likely that he will not begin serving any “balance due” until early 2027. This assumes all of his appellate efforts fail, which they usually do.
Preet’s recording In his law office and I’m watching in mine
Cape cod is here
Since the Rico charge was found not guilty, what is the likelihood that on appeal that the two charges Diddy was found guilty on be dismissed due to the fact the Government was able to introduce evidence that normally would not have been able to be presented to a jury was admitted. Of course, If those acts occurred beyond normal statute of limitations.
Iowa is in the house!
Chicago here, but listening in Mexico
#TeamPreet
Looking forward to hearing your comments, especially if you believe that the prosecution overreached in bringing the RICO count.
Any thoughts regarding why prosecution did not or was not able to have any other members of the “enterprise” testify?
🩷🩵💚❤️💓🙊🙉🙈🪬🙏🧸🐘🐘🐘🐘🐘🐘🐢🐦💙🍫🪙💯
July 4th
We shoot spectacular rockets into the sky
because once a bunch of gentrified men
in powdered wigs and buckled shoes
got tired of bowing to a king across the ocean.
They began our independence.
Thirteen colonies—already rich
already running the land with slave labor
already printing money and making deals—
stood up and said
No more kings.
They declared their independence
not just from England
but from monarchy
from feudal rule
from the long, bony fingers of empire.
Jefferson wrote it down—
“all men are created equal”—
but what he meant was
all men like me,
men with land, money, libraries,
and ownership over other people’s bodies.
We were taught to revere that line
engrave it into our history books
tattoo it on marble
pretend it included all of us
even when it didn’t.
The truth is
the Declaration changed the world
and still
it’s unfinished.
We’re still trying to catch up to the promise.
Still trying to stretch “equality” wide enough
to hold everybody.
Some fear equality.
Of course they do.
Because equality means sharing.
It means giving up the illusion of being better.
It means the old systems get torn down,
and the new ones don’t have a king at the top.
But deep down
we all know
equality under the law is the only fair way to live.
The only way that feels like truth.
The only way that doesn’t rot.
So yeah—
let’s light the fireworks
let’s eat and laugh
and chase the ghosts away with bottle rockets
and burnt hot dogs
and loud songs we all half-remember.
Let’s celebrate freedom
as an aspiration,
not a finished thing.
Because independence is a beginning.
And equality—
Equality is the destination.
Elie.
So happy you are here!!!!
LOL. I'm not your dad.
Well I actually wanted to know if you knew about The "Permanent Peoples' Tribunal on Gaza"? On June 19th, after the second public hearing, (first heg. in May) the judges determined that Israel and Netanyahu are committing the genocide of the Palestinian people. They also indicated that U.S. President Trump is financially and provide help Israel to commit genocide of the Palestinian people. U.S. Congress who vote and distribute financial help to Israel are also responsible for the genocide of the Palestinian people.
Trump was also declared as escalating destabilization, with Netanyahu's influence in the Middle East and the PPT want that to be stopped.
This will go the ICJ.
WHAT HAS TO HAPPEN FOR THIS GENOCIDE TO STOP?
Netanyahu is coming to White House this coming week for more $ begging. But now we know that the PPT has findings.
Thanks for the clarity
Here from Palm Springs!
I am here from Long Beach
Prediction: Sean Diddy Combs will get bail pending sentencing and that bail will be continued pending appeal. (1) There’s a substantial question of law likely to result in reversal or a new trial, as required under 18 U.S.C. § 3143(b)(1)(B). (2) He is not a flight risk, now that the threat of a life sentence is off the table. (3) He has already served a significant amount of pretrial detention, mitigating public safety concerns and suggesting he's not a danger or a fugitive risk. (4) The case raises appealable legal errors, especially if they pertain to jury instructions, admissibility of key evidence, or denial of certain constitutional protections (e.g., confrontation clause or due process issues). (5) With “Life” off the table, continued detention could be argued as punitive rather than regulatory—which violates United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (1987). The foregoing is especially true with a clean pretrial record and no misconduct during his year-long pre-trial detention. If bail pending appeal is denied, that decision is separately appealable. If Combs does receive a term of imprisonment beyond what he has already served, it is likely that he will not begin serving any “balance due” until early 2027. This assumes all of his appellate efforts fail, which they usually do.
Sorry, I skip the live sessions because of streaming issues. The recordings come through fine, but live sessions are hard to listen to.